Digg
Google Buzz
LinkedIn
Stumbleupon
Delicious
India - Household Consumer Expenditure Type-1, July 2009 - June 2010, NSS 66th Round
| Reference ID | DDI-IND-NSSO-66-SCHEDULE-1.0T1 |
| Year | 2009 - 2010 |
| Country | India |
| Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office,NSSO - Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation, Govenment of India |
| Sponsor(s) | Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation, Govenment of Indis - MOSPI - |
| Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 18, 2018
Last modified
Mar 27, 2019
Page views
192167
- Identification of Sa
mple Household - Household Characteri
stics - Demographic and othe
r particulars of hou
sehold members - Consumption of cerea
ls, pulses, milk and
milk products, suga
r and salt during th
e last 30 days - Consumption of cloth
ing, bedding and foo
twear during last 30
and 365 days - Expenditure on educa
tion and medical (in
stitutional) goods a
nd services - Expenditure on misce
llaneous goods and s
ervices including me
dical (non-instituti
onal), rents and tax
es during the last 3
0 days - Expenditure for purc
hase and constructio
n (including repair
and maintenance) of
durable goods for do
mestic use - Summary of comsumer
expenditure
Variable Groups
Meal by employer
(Meals_employer)
File: Demographic and other particulars of household members
File: Demographic and other particulars of household members
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 117606 Invalid: 0 |
Definition
Sometimes meals are provided by the employer. These may be as perquisites or as part of wages in kind. These meals are generally consumed at the place of work and are to be considered as meals taken away from home. It may not be rare that meals provided by the employer are brought home by the employees and consumed there. Such meals are also to be considered as meals taken away from home.
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 72799 |  61.9%
| |
| 00 | 43082 | 36.6%
| |
| 01 | 4 | 0.0%
| |
| 02 | 11 | 0.0%
| |
| 03 | 12 | 0.0%
| |
| 04 | 7 | 0.0%
| |
| 05 | 22 | 0.0%
| |
| 06 | 20 | 0.0%
| |
| 07 | 4 | 0.0%
| |
| 08 | 21 | 0.0%
| |
| 1 | 10 | 0.0%
| |
| 10 | 212 | 0.2%
| |
| 11 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 12 | 46 | 0.0%
| |
| 13 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 14 | 19 | 0.0%
| |
| 15 | 63 | 0.1%
| |
| 16 | 24 | 0.0%
| |
| 17 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 18 | 23 | 0.0%
| |
| 19 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 2 | 42 | 0.0%
| |
| 20 | 221 | 0.2%
| |
| 21 | 4 | 0.0%
| |
| 22 | 19 | 0.0%
| |
| 23 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 24 | 25 | 0.0%
| |
| 25 | 68 | 0.1%
| |
| 26 | 38 | 0.0%
| |
| 27 | 4 | 0.0%
| |
| 28 | 13 | 0.0%
| |
| 3 | 11 | 0.0%
| |
| 30 | 206 | 0.2%
| |
| 32 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 35 | 5 | 0.0%
| |
| 36 | 4 | 0.0%
| |
| 37 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 39 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 4 | 31 | 0.0%
| |
| 40 | 30 | 0.0%
| |
| 42 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 44 | 4 | 0.0%
| |
| 45 | 7 | 0.0%
| |
| 46 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 48 | 7 | 0.0%
| |
| 5 | 39 | 0.0%
| |
| 50 | 24 | 0.0%
| |
| 51 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 52 | 9 | 0.0%
| |
| 54 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 55 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 56 | 10 | 0.0%
| |
| 57 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 58 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 6 | 44 | 0.0%
| |
| 60 | 180 | 0.2%
| |
| 61 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 63 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 66 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 68 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 69 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 7 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 70 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 72 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 75 | 5 | 0.0%
| |
| 78 | 7 | 0.0%
| |
| 8 | 23 | 0.0%
| |
| 80 | 6 | 0.0%
| |
| 81 | 6 | 0.0%
| |
| 82 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 84 | 6 | 0.0%
| |
| 85 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 86 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 88 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 9 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 90 | 76 | 0.1%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.