India - Fourth Economic Census 1998
Reference ID | IDDI-IND-MOSPI-4-EC-1998 |
Year | 0 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | Central Statistical Organisation(CSO) - Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India (GOI) |
Sponsor(s) | Government of India - GoI - |
Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 16, 2018
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
686577
- 02 Andhra Pradesh
- 03 Arunachal Pradesh
- 04 Assam
- 05 Bihar
- 06 Goa
- 07 Gujarat
- 08 Haryana
- 09 HP
- 10 J&K
- 11 Karnataka
- 12 Kerala
- 13 Madhya Pradesh
- 14 Maharashtra
- 15 Manipur
- 16 Meghalaya
- 17 Mizoram
- 18 Nagaland
- 19 Orissa
- 20 Punjab
- 21 Rajsthan
- 22 Sikkim
- 23 TamilNadu
- 24 Tripura
- 25 UP
- 26 WB
- 27 AN&Island
- 28 Chandigarh
- 29 Dadar & Nagar
Haveli - 30 Daman & Diu
- 31 Delhi
- 32 Lashadweep
- 33 Pondichery
- 34 Jharkhand
- 35 Chhattisgarh
- 36 Uttaranchal
IDENTIFICATION NO (ID NO)
(ID_NO)
File: 29 Dadar & Nagar Haveli
File: 29 Dadar & Nagar Haveli
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 12 | Valid cases: 3977 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
290100100001 | 382 | 9.6% | |
290100100002 | 34 | 0.9% | |
290100100003 | 9 | 0.2% | |
290100100004 | 31 | 0.8% | |
290100100005 | 49 | 1.2% | |
290100100006 | 32 | 0.8% | |
290100100007 | 57 | 1.4% | |
290100100008 | 2 | 0.1% | |
290100100009 | 37 | 0.9% | |
290100100010 | 11 | 0.3% | |
290100100011 | 39 | 1.0% | |
290100100012 | 43 | 1.1% | |
290100100013 | 53 | 1.3% | |
290100100014 | 1 | 0.0% | |
290100100015 | 252 | 6.3% | |
290100100016 | 4 | 0.1% | |
290100100017 | 45 | 1.1% | |
290100100018 | 149 | 3.7% | |
290100100019 | 166 | 4.2% | |
290100100020 | 20 | 0.5% | |
290100100021 | 19 | 0.5% | |
290100100022 | 117 | 2.9% | |
290100100023 | 76 | 1.9% | |
290100100024 | 37 | 0.9% | |
290100100025 | 6 | 0.2% | |
290100100026 | 9 | 0.2% | |
290100100027 | 20 | 0.5% | |
290100100028 | 35 | 0.9% | |
290100100029 | 14 | 0.4% | |
290100100030 | 47 | 1.2% | |
290100100031 | 10 | 0.3% | |
290100100032 | 53 | 1.3% | |
290100100033 | 12 | 0.3% | |
290100100034 | 20 | 0.5% | |
290100100035 | 38 | 1.0% | |
290100100036 | 92 | 2.3% | |
290100100037 | 6 | 0.2% | |
290100100038 | 3 | 0.1% | |
290100100039 | 1 | 0.0% | |
290100100042 | 2 | 0.1% | |
290100100043 | 4 | 0.1% | |
290100100044 | 5 | 0.1% | |
290100100045 | 2 | 0.1% | |
290100100046 | 25 | 0.6% | |
290100100047 | 4 | 0.1% | |
290100100048 | 6 | 0.2% | |
290100100049 | 2 | 0.1% | |
290100100050 | 12 | 0.3% | |
290100100051 | 1 | 0.0% | |
290100100052 | 12 | 0.3% | |
290100100053 | 35 | 0.9% | |
290100100054 | 138 | 3.5% | |
290100100055 | 18 | 0.5% | |
290100100056 | 13 | 0.3% | |
290100100057 | 28 | 0.7% | |
290100100058 | 55 | 1.4% | |
290100100059 | 5 | 0.1% | |
290100100060 | 6 | 0.2% | |
290100100061 | 25 | 0.6% | |
290100100062 | 14 | 0.4% | |
290100100063 | 17 | 0.4% | |
290100100064 | 12 | 0.3% | |
290100100065 | 28 | 0.7% | |
290100100066 | 3 | 0.1% | |
290100100067 | 12 | 0.3% | |
290100100068 | 12 | 0.3% | |
290100100069 | 13 | 0.3% | |
290100100070 | 12 | 0.3% | |
290100100071 | 501 | 12.6% | |
290100100801 | 27 | 0.7% | |
290100100802 | 11 | 0.3% | |
290100100803 | 76 | 1.9% | |
290100100804 | 101 | 2.5% | |
290100100805 | 121 | 3.0% | |
290100100806 | 95 | 2.4% | |
290100100807 | 13 | 0.3% | |
290100100808 | 3 | 0.1% | |
290100100809 | 54 | 1.4% | |
290100100810 | 45 | 1.1% | |
290100100811 | 76 | 1.9% | |
290100100812 | 13 | 0.3% | |
290100100813 | 23 | 0.6% | |
290100100814 | 42 | 1.1% | |
290100100815 | 78 | 2.0% | |
290100100816 | 96 | 2.4% | |
290100100817 | 50 | 1.3% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.