India - Fourth Economic Census 1998
Reference ID | IDDI-IND-MOSPI-4-EC-1998 |
Year | 0 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | Central Statistical Organisation(CSO) - Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India (GOI) |
Sponsor(s) | Government of India - GoI - |
Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 16, 2018
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
669846
- 02 Andhra Pradesh
- 03 Arunachal Pradesh
- 04 Assam
- 05 Bihar
- 06 Goa
- 07 Gujarat
- 08 Haryana
- 09 HP
- 10 J&K
- 11 Karnataka
- 12 Kerala
- 13 Madhya Pradesh
- 14 Maharashtra
- 15 Manipur
- 16 Meghalaya
- 17 Mizoram
- 18 Nagaland
- 19 Orissa
- 20 Punjab
- 21 Rajsthan
- 22 Sikkim
- 23 TamilNadu
- 24 Tripura
- 25 UP
- 26 WB
- 27 AN&Island
- 28 Chandigarh
- 29 Dadar & Nagar
Haveli - 30 Daman & Diu
- 31 Delhi
- 32 Lashadweep
- 33 Pondichery
- 34 Jharkhand
- 35 Chhattisgarh
- 36 Uttaranchal
UFS BLOCK
(UFS_BLOCK)
File: 08 Haryana
File: 08 Haryana
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 532817 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
00 | 237420 | 44.6% | |
01 | 14294 | 2.7% | |
02 | 13267 | 2.5% | |
03 | 12247 | 2.3% | |
04 | 13239 | 2.5% | |
05 | 12894 | 2.4% | |
06 | 13055 | 2.5% | |
07 | 12730 | 2.4% | |
08 | 14798 | 2.8% | |
09 | 10814 | 2.0% | |
10 | 12366 | 2.3% | |
11 | 11143 | 2.1% | |
12 | 11482 | 2.2% | |
13 | 10577 | 2.0% | |
14 | 10020 | 1.9% | |
15 | 9848 | 1.8% | |
16 | 10457 | 2.0% | |
17 | 9561 | 1.8% | |
18 | 9169 | 1.7% | |
19 | 9537 | 1.8% | |
20 | 8867 | 1.7% | |
21 | 8110 | 1.5% | |
22 | 7881 | 1.5% | |
23 | 6740 | 1.3% | |
24 | 7364 | 1.4% | |
25 | 6763 | 1.3% | |
26 | 5654 | 1.1% | |
27 | 4696 | 0.9% | |
28 | 4046 | 0.8% | |
29 | 4080 | 0.8% | |
30 | 2749 | 0.5% | |
31 | 1756 | 0.3% | |
32 | 1535 | 0.3% | |
33 | 1378 | 0.3% | |
34 | 700 | 0.1% | |
35 | 479 | 0.1% | |
36 | 509 | 0.1% | |
37 | 199 | 0.0% | |
38 | 82 | 0.0% | |
39 | 87 | 0.0% | |
40 | 38 | 0.0% | |
41 | 165 | 0.0% | |
42 | 18 | 0.0% | |
43 | 3 | 0.0% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.