India - Fourth Economic Census 1998
Reference ID | IDDI-IND-MOSPI-4-EC-1998 |
Year | 0 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | Central Statistical Organisation(CSO) - Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India (GOI) |
Sponsor(s) | Government of India - GoI - |
Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 16, 2018
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
685987
- 02 Andhra Pradesh
- 03 Arunachal Pradesh
- 04 Assam
- 05 Bihar
- 06 Goa
- 07 Gujarat
- 08 Haryana
- 09 HP
- 10 J&K
- 11 Karnataka
- 12 Kerala
- 13 Madhya Pradesh
- 14 Maharashtra
- 15 Manipur
- 16 Meghalaya
- 17 Mizoram
- 18 Nagaland
- 19 Orissa
- 20 Punjab
- 21 Rajsthan
- 22 Sikkim
- 23 TamilNadu
- 24 Tripura
- 25 UP
- 26 WB
- 27 AN&Island
- 28 Chandigarh
- 29 Dadar & Nagar
Haveli - 30 Daman & Diu
- 31 Delhi
- 32 Lashadweep
- 33 Pondichery
- 34 Jharkhand
- 35 Chhattisgarh
- 36 Uttaranchal
WARD CODE
(WARD)
File: 05 Bihar
File: 05 Bihar
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 3 | Valid cases: 1043864 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
000 | 922075 | 88.3% | |
001 | 9399 | 0.9% | |
002 | 1995 | 0.2% | |
003 | 1701 | 0.2% | |
004 | 7801 | 0.7% | |
005 | 1747 | 0.2% | |
006 | 70733 | 6.8% | |
007 | 3796 | 0.4% | |
008 | 7940 | 0.8% | |
009 | 2014 | 0.2% | |
010 | 994 | 0.1% | |
011 | 1262 | 0.1% | |
012 | 1027 | 0.1% | |
013 | 1865 | 0.2% | |
014 | 1048 | 0.1% | |
015 | 981 | 0.1% | |
016 | 694 | 0.1% | |
017 | 400 | 0.0% | |
018 | 363 | 0.0% | |
019 | 278 | 0.0% | |
020 | 364 | 0.0% | |
021 | 567 | 0.1% | |
022 | 250 | 0.0% | |
023 | 167 | 0.0% | |
024 | 169 | 0.0% | |
025 | 612 | 0.1% | |
026 | 102 | 0.0% | |
027 | 319 | 0.0% | |
028 | 376 | 0.0% | |
029 | 279 | 0.0% | |
030 | 449 | 0.0% | |
031 | 279 | 0.0% | |
032 | 166 | 0.0% | |
033 | 768 | 0.1% | |
034 | 515 | 0.0% | |
035 | 154 | 0.0% | |
036 | 109 | 0.0% | |
037 | 65 | 0.0% | |
080 | 11 | 0.0% | |
100 | 1 | 0.0% | |
400 | 26 | 0.0% | |
500 | 1 | 0.0% | |
600 | 1 | 0.0% | |
800 | 1 | 0.0% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.