India - Household Consumer Expenditure, July 2000 - June 2001, NSS 56th Round
Reference ID | DDI-IND-MOSPI-NSSO-56Rnd-Sch1-July2000-June2001 |
Year | 2000 - 2001 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office - M/o Statistics and Programme Implementation(MOSPI),Government of India (GOI) |
Sponsor(s) | M/o Statistics & Programme Implementation, GOI - MOSPI - |
Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 17, 2018
Last modified
Mar 27, 2019
Page views
175825
- Blocks 1,3,10_Househ
old characteristics
and perception of ho
usehold regarding su
fficiency of food - Block 4_Person recor
ds - Block 5_Monthly hous
ehold expenditure on
food and non-food i
tems - Block 5pt1_Monthly h
ousehold expenditure
on fuel and light - Block 6_Annual house
hold expenditure on
clothing - Block 7_Annual house
hold expenditure on
footwear - Block 8pt1_Annual ho
usehold expenditure
on education and med
ical (institutional)
goods and services - Block 8pt2_Monthly h
ousehold expenditure
on medical (non-ins
titutional) goods an
d services - Block 9_Annual house
hold expenditure on
durables
Variable Groups
Usual Activity. Subsidiary Status
(B4_q10)
File: Block 4_Person records
File: Block 4_Person records
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 30326 Invalid: 0 |
Questions and instructions
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
11 | worked in household enterprise (self employed) as an own account worker | 11398 | 37.6% |
12 | worked in household enterprise (self employed) as an employer | 414 | 1.4% |
21 | worked in household enterprise (self employed) as ‘helper’ | 11219 | 37.0% |
31 | worked as regular salaried/wage employee | 540 | 1.8% |
41 | worked as casual wage labour in public works | 181 | 0.6% |
51 | casual wage labour in other types of works | 6574 | 21.7% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Classification of each individual into a unique status poses a problem when more than one of the three activity statuses listed above concurrently obtain for a person. In such an eventuality, the identification uniquely under any one of the three activity statuses is done by adopting either the major time or priority criterion. The former is used for classification of persons under 'usual activity status' and the latter for classification of persons under 'current activity status'. The three major activity statuses have been further sub-divided into several detailed activity categories. If a person categorised as engaged in economic/non-economic activity, by adopting one of the two criteria mentioned above, is found to be pursuing more than one economic/non-economic activity during the reference period, the appropriate detailed status code will relate to the activity in which relatively more time has been spent.