India - Fourth Economic Census 1998
Reference ID | IDDI-IND-MOSPI-4-EC-1998 |
Year | 0 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | Central Statistical Organisation(CSO) - Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India (GOI) |
Sponsor(s) | Government of India - GoI - |
Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 16, 2018
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
672310
- 02 Andhra Pradesh
- 03 Arunachal Pradesh
- 04 Assam
- 05 Bihar
- 06 Goa
- 07 Gujarat
- 08 Haryana
- 09 HP
- 10 J&K
- 11 Karnataka
- 12 Kerala
- 13 Madhya Pradesh
- 14 Maharashtra
- 15 Manipur
- 16 Meghalaya
- 17 Mizoram
- 18 Nagaland
- 19 Orissa
- 20 Punjab
- 21 Rajsthan
- 22 Sikkim
- 23 TamilNadu
- 24 Tripura
- 25 UP
- 26 WB
- 27 AN&Island
- 28 Chandigarh
- 29 Dadar & Nagar
Haveli - 30 Daman & Diu
- 31 Delhi
- 32 Lashadweep
- 33 Pondichery
- 34 Jharkhand
- 35 Chhattisgarh
- 36 Uttaranchal
UFS BLOCK
(UFS_BLOCK)
File: 34 Jharkhand
File: 34 Jharkhand
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 398910 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
00 | 231826 | 58.1% | |
01 | 8284 | 2.1% | |
02 | 6601 | 1.7% | |
03 | 8172 | 2.0% | |
04 | 7592 | 1.9% | |
05 | 8210 | 2.1% | |
06 | 8618 | 2.2% | |
07 | 9376 | 2.4% | |
08 | 6905 | 1.7% | |
09 | 7532 | 1.9% | |
10 | 8014 | 2.0% | |
11 | 6725 | 1.7% | |
12 | 6514 | 1.6% | |
13 | 5869 | 1.5% | |
14 | 6285 | 1.6% | |
15 | 5841 | 1.5% | |
16 | 5486 | 1.4% | |
17 | 5815 | 1.5% | |
18 | 5304 | 1.3% | |
19 | 4503 | 1.1% | |
20 | 4474 | 1.1% | |
21 | 4162 | 1.0% | |
22 | 3690 | 0.9% | |
23 | 3518 | 0.9% | |
24 | 3109 | 0.8% | |
25 | 2630 | 0.7% | |
26 | 2318 | 0.6% | |
27 | 1957 | 0.5% | |
28 | 1674 | 0.4% | |
29 | 1394 | 0.3% | |
30 | 1344 | 0.3% | |
31 | 939 | 0.2% | |
32 | 1040 | 0.3% | |
33 | 695 | 0.2% | |
34 | 724 | 0.2% | |
35 | 254 | 0.1% | |
36 | 234 | 0.1% | |
37 | 248 | 0.1% | |
38 | 188 | 0.0% | |
39 | 141 | 0.0% | |
40 | 251 | 0.1% | |
41 | 71 | 0.0% | |
42 | 93 | 0.0% | |
43 | 110 | 0.0% | |
44 | 180 | 0.0% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.