India - Fourth Economic Census 1998
Reference ID | IDDI-IND-MOSPI-4-EC-1998 |
Year | 0 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | Central Statistical Organisation(CSO) - Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India (GOI) |
Sponsor(s) | Government of India - GoI - |
Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 16, 2018
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
684785
- 02 Andhra Pradesh
- 03 Arunachal Pradesh
- 04 Assam
- 05 Bihar
- 06 Goa
- 07 Gujarat
- 08 Haryana
- 09 HP
- 10 J&K
- 11 Karnataka
- 12 Kerala
- 13 Madhya Pradesh
- 14 Maharashtra
- 15 Manipur
- 16 Meghalaya
- 17 Mizoram
- 18 Nagaland
- 19 Orissa
- 20 Punjab
- 21 Rajsthan
- 22 Sikkim
- 23 TamilNadu
- 24 Tripura
- 25 UP
- 26 WB
- 27 AN&Island
- 28 Chandigarh
- 29 Dadar & Nagar
Haveli - 30 Daman & Diu
- 31 Delhi
- 32 Lashadweep
- 33 Pondichery
- 34 Jharkhand
- 35 Chhattisgarh
- 36 Uttaranchal
PAGE NO
(P_NO)
File: 22 Sikkim
File: 22 Sikkim
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 3 | Valid cases: 13059 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
001 | 2651 | 20.3% | |
002 | 1863 | 14.3% | |
003 | 1293 | 9.9% | |
004 | 979 | 7.5% | |
005 | 815 | 6.2% | |
006 | 741 | 5.7% | |
007 | 638 | 4.9% | |
008 | 523 | 4.0% | |
009 | 433 | 3.3% | |
010 | 425 | 3.3% | |
011 | 366 | 2.8% | |
012 | 306 | 2.3% | |
013 | 257 | 2.0% | |
014 | 236 | 1.8% | |
015 | 205 | 1.6% | |
016 | 166 | 1.3% | |
017 | 165 | 1.3% | |
018 | 131 | 1.0% | |
019 | 121 | 0.9% | |
020 | 108 | 0.8% | |
021 | 76 | 0.6% | |
022 | 48 | 0.4% | |
023 | 52 | 0.4% | |
024 | 44 | 0.3% | |
025 | 39 | 0.3% | |
026 | 43 | 0.3% | |
027 | 41 | 0.3% | |
028 | 38 | 0.3% | |
029 | 39 | 0.3% | |
030 | 24 | 0.2% | |
031 | 23 | 0.2% | |
032 | 14 | 0.1% | |
033 | 18 | 0.1% | |
034 | 20 | 0.2% | |
035 | 28 | 0.2% | |
036 | 7 | 0.1% | |
037 | 13 | 0.1% | |
038 | 14 | 0.1% | |
039 | 15 | 0.1% | |
040 | 11 | 0.1% | |
041 | 6 | 0.0% | |
042 | 7 | 0.1% | |
043 | 6 | 0.0% | |
044 | 3 | 0.0% | |
107 | 1 | 0.0% | |
120 | 7 | 0.1% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.