Digg
Google Buzz
LinkedIn
Stumbleupon
Delicious
India - Fourth Economic Census 1998
| Reference ID | IDDI-IND-MOSPI-4-EC-1998 |
| Year | 0 |
| Country | India |
| Producer(s) | Central Statistical Organisation(CSO) - Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India (GOI) |
| Sponsor(s) | Government of India - GoI - |
| Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 16, 2018
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
718311
- 02 Andhra Pradesh
- 03 Arunachal Pradesh
- 04 Assam
- 05 Bihar
- 06 Goa
- 07 Gujarat
- 08 Haryana
- 09 HP
- 10 J&K
- 11 Karnataka
- 12 Kerala
- 13 Madhya Pradesh
- 14 Maharashtra
- 15 Manipur
- 16 Meghalaya
- 17 Mizoram
- 18 Nagaland
- 19 Orissa
- 20 Punjab
- 21 Rajsthan
- 22 Sikkim
- 23 TamilNadu
- 24 Tripura
- 25 UP
- 26 WB
- 27 AN&Island
- 28 Chandigarh
- 29 Dadar & Nagar
Haveli - 30 Daman & Diu
- 31 Delhi
- 32 Lashadweep
- 33 Pondichery
- 34 Jharkhand
- 35 Chhattisgarh
- 36 Uttaranchal
REMARKS
(REMAKS)
File: 17 Mizoram
File: 17 Mizoram
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 3 | Valid cases: 24943 Invalid: 0 |
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 000 | 27 |  0.1%
| |
| 001 | 983 | 3.9%
| |
| 002 | 1713 | 6.9%
| |
| 003 | 2566 | 10.3%
| |
| 004 | 2528 | 10.1%
| |
| 005 | 2349 | 9.4%
| |
| 006 | 2098 | 8.4%
| |
| 007 | 1771 | 7.1%
| |
| 008 | 1204 | 4.8%
| |
| 009 | 1108 | 4.4%
| |
| 010 | 988 | 4.0%
| |
| 011 | 820 | 3.3%
| |
| 012 | 598 | 2.4%
| |
| 013 | 453 | 1.8%
| |
| 014 | 543 | 2.2%
| |
| 015 | 599 | 2.4%
| |
| 016 | 485 | 1.9%
| |
| 017 | 336 | 1.3%
| |
| 018 | 449 | 1.8%
| |
| 019 | 15 | 0.1%
| |
| 020 | 404 | 1.6%
| |
| 021 | 214 | 0.9%
| |
| 022 | 26 | 0.1%
| |
| 023 | 589 | 2.4%
| |
| 024 | 116 | 0.5%
| |
| 025 | 10 | 0.0%
| |
| 027 | 135 | 0.5%
| |
| 028 | 117 | 0.5%
| |
| 029 | 145 | 0.6%
| |
| 030 | 150 | 0.6%
| |
| 033 | 160 | 0.6%
| |
| 042 | 210 | 0.8%
| |
| 052 | 255 | 1.0%
| |
| 064 | 8 | 0.0%
| |
| 073 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 075 | 372 | 1.5%
| |
| 080 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 083 | 397 | 1.6%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.