Digg
Google Buzz
LinkedIn
Stumbleupon
Delicious
India - Fourth Economic Census 1998
| Reference ID | IDDI-IND-MOSPI-4-EC-1998 |
| Year | 0 |
| Country | India |
| Producer(s) | Central Statistical Organisation(CSO) - Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India (GOI) |
| Sponsor(s) | Government of India - GoI - |
| Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 16, 2018
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
668548
- 02 Andhra Pradesh
- 03 Arunachal Pradesh
- 04 Assam
- 05 Bihar
- 06 Goa
- 07 Gujarat
- 08 Haryana
- 09 HP
- 10 J&K
- 11 Karnataka
- 12 Kerala
- 13 Madhya Pradesh
- 14 Maharashtra
- 15 Manipur
- 16 Meghalaya
- 17 Mizoram
- 18 Nagaland
- 19 Orissa
- 20 Punjab
- 21 Rajsthan
- 22 Sikkim
- 23 TamilNadu
- 24 Tripura
- 25 UP
- 26 WB
- 27 AN&Island
- 28 Chandigarh
- 29 Dadar & Nagar
Haveli - 30 Daman & Diu
- 31 Delhi
- 32 Lashadweep
- 33 Pondichery
- 34 Jharkhand
- 35 Chhattisgarh
- 36 Uttaranchal
TOTAL OF TOTAL
(TOT)
File: 17 Mizoram
File: 17 Mizoram
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 5 | Valid cases: 24943 Invalid: 0 |
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00001 | 13831 |  55.5%
| |
| 00002 | 5365 | 21.5%
| |
| 00003 | 1886 | 7.6%
| |
| 00004 | 973 | 3.9%
| |
| 00005 | 629 | 2.5%
| |
| 00006 | 395 | 1.6%
| |
| 00007 | 324 | 1.3%
| |
| 00008 | 300 | 1.2%
| |
| 00009 | 202 | 0.8%
| |
| 00010 | 160 | 0.6%
| |
| 00011 | 108 | 0.4%
| |
| 00012 | 69 | 0.3%
| |
| 00013 | 78 | 0.3%
| |
| 00014 | 52 | 0.2%
| |
| 00015 | 56 | 0.2%
| |
| 00016 | 44 | 0.2%
| |
| 00017 | 25 | 0.1%
| |
| 00018 | 21 | 0.1%
| |
| 00019 | 23 | 0.1%
| |
| 00020 | 29 | 0.1%
| |
| 00021 | 34 | 0.1%
| |
| 00022 | 17 | 0.1%
| |
| 00023 | 8 | 0.0%
| |
| 00024 | 14 | 0.1%
| |
| 00025 | 16 | 0.1%
| |
| 00026 | 13 | 0.1%
| |
| 00027 | 22 | 0.1%
| |
| 00028 | 11 | 0.0%
| |
| 00029 | 7 | 0.0%
| |
| 00030 | 17 | 0.1%
| |
| 00031 | 11 | 0.0%
| |
| 00032 | 6 | 0.0%
| |
| 00033 | 4 | 0.0%
| |
| 00034 | 6 | 0.0%
| |
| 00035 | 9 | 0.0%
| |
| 00036 | 9 | 0.0%
| |
| 00037 | 5 | 0.0%
| |
| 00038 | 4 | 0.0%
| |
| 00039 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00040 | 5 | 0.0%
| |
| 00041 | 5 | 0.0%
| |
| 00042 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 00043 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 00044 | 8 | 0.0%
| |
| 00045 | 6 | 0.0%
| |
| 00046 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00047 | 4 | 0.0%
| |
| 00048 | 4 | 0.0%
| |
| 00050 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 00051 | 4 | 0.0%
| |
| 00052 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 00053 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00054 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 00055 | 6 | 0.0%
| |
| 00056 | 4 | 0.0%
| |
| 00057 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00059 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00060 | 4 | 0.0%
| |
| 00061 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 00062 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 00063 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 00064 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 00065 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 00066 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00067 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 00068 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00070 | 6 | 0.0%
| |
| 00072 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 00076 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00078 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 00079 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00080 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 00081 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 00084 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 00088 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00090 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 00093 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00097 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 00098 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 00102 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00103 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00104 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 00107 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00112 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00113 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00114 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00115 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00116 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00118 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00121 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00128 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00129 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00134 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00135 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00136 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00137 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00144 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 00146 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00148 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00152 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00158 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00160 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00169 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00170 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00174 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 00175 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00177 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00178 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00183 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00190 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00201 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00218 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00219 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00230 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 00250 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00257 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00258 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00299 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00336 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00376 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00413 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00458 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 00532 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 01144 | 1 | 0.0%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.