Digg
Google Buzz
LinkedIn
Stumbleupon
Delicious
India - Fourth Economic Census 1998
| Reference ID | IDDI-IND-MOSPI-4-EC-1998 |
| Year | 0 |
| Country | India |
| Producer(s) | Central Statistical Organisation(CSO) - Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India (GOI) |
| Sponsor(s) | Government of India - GoI - |
| Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 16, 2018
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
669863
- 02 Andhra Pradesh
- 03 Arunachal Pradesh
- 04 Assam
- 05 Bihar
- 06 Goa
- 07 Gujarat
- 08 Haryana
- 09 HP
- 10 J&K
- 11 Karnataka
- 12 Kerala
- 13 Madhya Pradesh
- 14 Maharashtra
- 15 Manipur
- 16 Meghalaya
- 17 Mizoram
- 18 Nagaland
- 19 Orissa
- 20 Punjab
- 21 Rajsthan
- 22 Sikkim
- 23 TamilNadu
- 24 Tripura
- 25 UP
- 26 WB
- 27 AN&Island
- 28 Chandigarh
- 29 Dadar & Nagar
Haveli - 30 Daman & Diu
- 31 Delhi
- 32 Lashadweep
- 33 Pondichery
- 34 Jharkhand
- 35 Chhattisgarh
- 36 Uttaranchal
WARD CODE
(WARD)
File: 10 J&K
File: 10 J&K
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 3 | Valid cases: 215600 Invalid: 0 |
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 000 | 193861 |  89.9%
| |
| 001 | 2210 | 1.0%
| |
| 002 | 337 | 0.2%
| |
| 003 | 966 | 0.4%
| |
| 004 | 1080 | 0.5%
| |
| 005 | 1162 | 0.5%
| |
| 006 | 4654 | 2.2%
| |
| 007 | 1610 | 0.7%
| |
| 008 | 1023 | 0.5%
| |
| 009 | 1649 | 0.8%
| |
| 010 | 681 | 0.3%
| |
| 011 | 500 | 0.2%
| |
| 012 | 584 | 0.3%
| |
| 013 | 569 | 0.3%
| |
| 014 | 13 | 0.0%
| |
| 016 | 760 | 0.4%
| |
| 017 | 84 | 0.0%
| |
| 018 | 668 | 0.3%
| |
| 019 | 578 | 0.3%
| |
| 020 | 479 | 0.2%
| |
| 022 | 171 | 0.1%
| |
| 023 | 189 | 0.1%
| |
| 034 | 30 | 0.0%
| |
| 038 | 25 | 0.0%
| |
| 039 | 39 | 0.0%
| |
| 100 | 111 | 0.1%
| |
| 110 | 139 | 0.1%
| |
| 168 | 9 | 0.0%
| |
| 200 | 20 | 0.0%
| |
| 210 | 68 | 0.0%
| |
| 216 | 76 | 0.0%
| |
| 300 | 12 | 0.0%
| |
| 400 | 395 | 0.2%
| |
| 409 | 120 | 0.1%
| |
| 500 | 189 | 0.1%
| |
| 600 | 37 | 0.0%
| |
| 700 | 265 | 0.1%
| |
| 800 | 236 | 0.1%
| |
| 900 | 1 | 0.0%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.