India - Fourth Economic Census 1998
Reference ID | IDDI-IND-MOSPI-4-EC-1998 |
Year | 0 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | Central Statistical Organisation(CSO) - Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India (GOI) |
Sponsor(s) | Government of India - GoI - |
Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 16, 2018
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
682007
- 02 Andhra Pradesh
- 03 Arunachal Pradesh
- 04 Assam
- 05 Bihar
- 06 Goa
- 07 Gujarat
- 08 Haryana
- 09 HP
- 10 J&K
- 11 Karnataka
- 12 Kerala
- 13 Madhya Pradesh
- 14 Maharashtra
- 15 Manipur
- 16 Meghalaya
- 17 Mizoram
- 18 Nagaland
- 19 Orissa
- 20 Punjab
- 21 Rajsthan
- 22 Sikkim
- 23 TamilNadu
- 24 Tripura
- 25 UP
- 26 WB
- 27 AN&Island
- 28 Chandigarh
- 29 Dadar & Nagar
Haveli - 30 Daman & Diu
- 31 Delhi
- 32 Lashadweep
- 33 Pondichery
- 34 Jharkhand
- 35 Chhattisgarh
- 36 Uttaranchal
REGISTRATION CODE
(REGISN)
File: 07 Gujarat
File: 07 Gujarat
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 1914576 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
00 | 1890760 | 98.8% | |
01 | 12 | 0.0% | |
02 | 7 | 0.0% | |
03 | 2 | 0.0% | |
05 | 20 | 0.0% | |
06 | 5 | 0.0% | |
07 | 1 | 0.0% | |
09 | 9 | 0.0% | |
11 | 13756 | 0.7% | |
12 | 835 | 0.0% | |
13 | 36 | 0.0% | |
14 | 38 | 0.0% | |
15 | 59 | 0.0% | |
16 | 22 | 0.0% | |
17 | 1 | 0.0% | |
18 | 4 | 0.0% | |
19 | 5 | 0.0% | |
22 | 4849 | 0.3% | |
23 | 18 | 0.0% | |
24 | 6 | 0.0% | |
25 | 12 | 0.0% | |
26 | 18 | 0.0% | |
27 | 4 | 0.0% | |
28 | 58 | 0.0% | |
29 | 1 | 0.0% | |
33 | 808 | 0.0% | |
34 | 1 | 0.0% | |
35 | 6 | 0.0% | |
36 | 2 | 0.0% | |
37 | 2 | 0.0% | |
39 | 1 | 0.0% | |
44 | 526 | 0.0% | |
45 | 3 | 0.0% | |
46 | 1 | 0.0% | |
48 | 6 | 0.0% | |
49 | 1 | 0.0% | |
55 | 188 | 0.0% | |
56 | 5 | 0.0% | |
57 | 1 | 0.0% | |
59 | 4 | 0.0% | |
66 | 2385 | 0.1% | |
67 | 2 | 0.0% | |
69 | 3 | 0.0% | |
77 | 7 | 0.0% | |
78 | 1 | 0.0% | |
79 | 1 | 0.0% | |
88 | 15 | 0.0% | |
89 | 5 | 0.0% | |
99 | 64 | 0.0% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.