India - Fifth Economic Census 2005
Reference ID | IDDI-IND-MOSPI-5-EC-2005 |
Year | 0 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | Central Statistical Office(CSO) - Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation (MOSPI), Government of India (GOI) |
Sponsor(s) | Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation - MOSPI - |
Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 15, 2018
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
468441
- EC2005_Andaman_&
_Nicobar_Island - EC2005_Andhra_Prades
h - EC2005_Arunachal Pra
desh - EC2005_Assam
- EC2005_Bihar
- EC2005_Chandigarh
- EC2005_Chhattisgarh
- EC2005_Dadar Nagar H
aveli - EC2005_Daman & D
iu - Ec2005_Delhi
- EC2005_Goa
- EC2005_Gujurat
- Ec2005_Haryana
- EC2005_Himachal_Prad
esh - EC2005_Jammu_and_Kas
hmir - EC2005_Jharkhand
- EC2005_Karnataka
- EC2005_Kerala
- EC2005_Lakshadweep
- EC2005_Madhya_Prades
h - EC2005_Maharashtra
- EC2005_Manipur
- EC2005_Meghalaya
- EC2005_Mizoram
- EC2005_Nagaland
- EC2005_Orissa
- EC2005_Puducherry
- EC2005_Punjab
- Ec2005_Rajasthan
- EC2005_Sikkim
- EC2005_Tamin_Nadu
- EC2005_Tripura
- EC2005_Uttar_Pradesh
- Ec2005_Uttarakhand
- EC2005_West_Bengal
District code
(DT)
File: EC2005_West_Bengal
File: EC2005_West_Bengal
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 4307248 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
01 | Darjiling | 72568 | 1.7% |
02 | Jalpaiguri | 160363 | 3.7% |
03 | Koch Bihar | 117197 | 2.7% |
04 | Uttar Dinajpur | 82204 | 1.9% |
05 | Dakshin Dinajpur * | 83242 | 1.9% |
06 | Maldah | 205733 | 4.8% |
07 | Murshidabad | 427040 | 9.9% |
08 | Birbhum | 130425 | 3.0% |
09 | Barddhaman | 311641 | 7.2% |
10 | Nadia | 246685 | 5.7% |
11 | North Twenty Four Pargana | 497967 | 11.6% |
12 | Hugli | 243373 | 5.7% |
13 | Bankura | 143734 | 3.3% |
14 | Puruliya | 97267 | 2.3% |
15 | Paschim Midnapor | 248635 | 5.8% |
16 | Haora | 215135 | 5.0% |
17 | Kolkata | 361558 | 8.4% |
18 | South Twenty Four Pargana | 402188 | 9.3% |
19 | Purba Medinipur | 260293 | 6.0% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.