India - Third Economic Census 1990
Reference ID | IDDI-IND-MOSPI-3-EC-1990 |
Year | 0 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | Central Statistical Organisation(CSO) - Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India (GOI) |
Collection(s) |
Created on
Apr 24, 2018
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
546040
- 02 Andhra Pradesh
- 03 Arunachal Pradesh
- 04 Assam
- 05 Bihar
- 06 Goa
- 07 Gujarat
- 08 Haryana
- 09 Himachal Pradesh
- 11 Karnataka
- 12 Kerala
- 13 Madhya Pradesh
- 14 Maharashtra
- 15 Manipur
- 16 Meghalaya
- 17 Mizoram
- 18 Nagaland
- 19 Orissa
- 20 Punjab
- 21 Rajasthan
- 22 Sikkim
- 23 Tamil Nadu
- 24 Tripura
- 25 Utter Pradesh
- 26 West Bengal
- 27 Andaman & Nic
obar - 28 Chandigarh
- 29 Dadar & Nagar
Haveli - 30 Daman & Diu
- 31 Delhi
- 33 Pondicherry
Srl. No of enterprise (Without premises)
(SRL_NO_ENTP_WP)
File: 30 Daman & Diu
File: 30 Daman & Diu
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 4 | Valid cases: 5411 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 2275 | 42.0% | |
1 | 161 | 3.0% | |
10 | 101 | 1.9% | |
100 | 3 | 0.1% | |
101 | 3 | 0.1% | |
102 | 3 | 0.1% | |
103 | 3 | 0.1% | |
104 | 2 | 0.0% | |
105 | 2 | 0.0% | |
106 | 2 | 0.0% | |
107 | 2 | 0.0% | |
108 | 2 | 0.0% | |
109 | 2 | 0.0% | |
11 | 94 | 1.7% | |
110 | 2 | 0.0% | |
111 | 2 | 0.0% | |
112 | 2 | 0.0% | |
113 | 2 | 0.0% | |
114 | 2 | 0.0% | |
115 | 2 | 0.0% | |
116 | 2 | 0.0% | |
117 | 2 | 0.0% | |
118 | 2 | 0.0% | |
119 | 2 | 0.0% | |
12 | 83 | 1.5% | |
120 | 2 | 0.0% | |
121 | 2 | 0.0% | |
122 | 2 | 0.0% | |
123 | 2 | 0.0% | |
124 | 2 | 0.0% | |
125 | 2 | 0.0% | |
126 | 2 | 0.0% | |
127 | 2 | 0.0% | |
128 | 2 | 0.0% | |
129 | 2 | 0.0% | |
13 | 76 | 1.4% | |
130 | 2 | 0.0% | |
131 | 2 | 0.0% | |
132 | 2 | 0.0% | |
133 | 2 | 0.0% | |
134 | 2 | 0.0% | |
135 | 1 | 0.0% | |
136 | 1 | 0.0% | |
137 | 1 | 0.0% | |
138 | 1 | 0.0% | |
139 | 1 | 0.0% | |
14 | 72 | 1.3% | |
140 | 1 | 0.0% | |
141 | 1 | 0.0% | |
142 | 1 | 0.0% | |
143 | 1 | 0.0% | |
144 | 1 | 0.0% | |
145 | 1 | 0.0% | |
146 | 1 | 0.0% | |
147 | 1 | 0.0% | |
148 | 1 | 0.0% | |
149 | 1 | 0.0% | |
15 | 66 | 1.2% | |
150 | 1 | 0.0% | |
151 | 1 | 0.0% | |
152 | 1 | 0.0% | |
153 | 1 | 0.0% | |
154 | 1 | 0.0% | |
16 | 59 | 1.1% | |
17 | 56 | 1.0% | |
18 | 54 | 1.0% | |
19 | 50 | 0.9% | |
2 | 155 | 2.9% | |
20 | 44 | 0.8% | |
21 | 43 | 0.8% | |
22 | 42 | 0.8% | |
23 | 40 | 0.7% | |
24 | 38 | 0.7% | |
25 | 38 | 0.7% | |
26 | 35 | 0.6% | |
27 | 35 | 0.6% | |
28 | 34 | 0.6% | |
29 | 31 | 0.6% | |
3 | 149 | 2.8% | |
30 | 31 | 0.6% | |
31 | 29 | 0.5% | |
32 | 28 | 0.5% | |
33 | 29 | 0.5% | |
34 | 29 | 0.5% | |
35 | 29 | 0.5% | |
36 | 28 | 0.5% | |
37 | 28 | 0.5% | |
38 | 27 | 0.5% | |
39 | 26 | 0.5% | |
4 | 147 | 2.7% | |
40 | 24 | 0.4% | |
41 | 24 | 0.4% | |
42 | 23 | 0.4% | |
43 | 20 | 0.4% | |
44 | 19 | 0.4% | |
45 | 18 | 0.3% | |
46 | 19 | 0.4% | |
47 | 19 | 0.4% | |
48 | 18 | 0.3% | |
49 | 16 | 0.3% | |
5 | 135 | 2.5% | |
50 | 13 | 0.2% | |
51 | 12 | 0.2% | |
52 | 10 | 0.2% | |
53 | 9 | 0.2% | |
54 | 10 | 0.2% | |
55 | 10 | 0.2% | |
56 | 9 | 0.2% | |
57 | 9 | 0.2% | |
58 | 9 | 0.2% | |
59 | 9 | 0.2% | |
6 | 124 | 2.3% | |
60 | 9 | 0.2% | |
61 | 7 | 0.1% | |
62 | 5 | 0.1% | |
63 | 6 | 0.1% | |
64 | 6 | 0.1% | |
65 | 6 | 0.1% | |
66 | 4 | 0.1% | |
67 | 5 | 0.1% | |
68 | 5 | 0.1% | |
69 | 4 | 0.1% | |
7 | 117 | 2.2% | |
70 | 5 | 0.1% | |
71 | 5 | 0.1% | |
72 | 4 | 0.1% | |
73 | 4 | 0.1% | |
74 | 4 | 0.1% | |
75 | 4 | 0.1% | |
76 | 4 | 0.1% | |
77 | 3 | 0.1% | |
78 | 3 | 0.1% | |
79 | 3 | 0.1% | |
8 | 114 | 2.1% | |
80 | 3 | 0.1% | |
81 | 3 | 0.1% | |
82 | 3 | 0.1% | |
83 | 3 | 0.1% | |
84 | 3 | 0.1% | |
85 | 3 | 0.1% | |
86 | 3 | 0.1% | |
87 | 3 | 0.1% | |
88 | 3 | 0.1% | |
89 | 3 | 0.1% | |
9 | 109 | 2.0% | |
90 | 3 | 0.1% | |
91 | 3 | 0.1% | |
92 | 3 | 0.1% | |
93 | 3 | 0.1% | |
94 | 3 | 0.1% | |
95 | 3 | 0.1% | |
96 | 3 | 0.1% | |
97 | 3 | 0.1% | |
98 | 3 | 0.1% | |
99 | 3 | 0.1% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.