India - Third Economic Census 1990
Reference ID | IDDI-IND-MOSPI-3-EC-1990 |
Year | 0 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | Central Statistical Organisation(CSO) - Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India (GOI) |
Collection(s) |
Created on
Apr 24, 2018
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
547083
- 02 Andhra Pradesh
- 03 Arunachal Pradesh
- 04 Assam
- 05 Bihar
- 06 Goa
- 07 Gujarat
- 08 Haryana
- 09 Himachal Pradesh
- 11 Karnataka
- 12 Kerala
- 13 Madhya Pradesh
- 14 Maharashtra
- 15 Manipur
- 16 Meghalaya
- 17 Mizoram
- 18 Nagaland
- 19 Orissa
- 20 Punjab
- 21 Rajasthan
- 22 Sikkim
- 23 Tamil Nadu
- 24 Tripura
- 25 Utter Pradesh
- 26 West Bengal
- 27 Andaman & Nic
obar - 28 Chandigarh
- 29 Dadar & Nagar
Haveli - 30 Daman & Diu
- 31 Delhi
- 33 Pondicherry
Srl. No. of Enterprise (Without premises)
(SRL_NO_ENTP_WOP)
File: 24 Tripura
File: 24 Tripura
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 4 | Valid cases: 82200 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 65115 | 79.2% | |
1 | 1849 | 2.2% | |
10 | 612 | 0.7% | |
11 | 545 | 0.7% | |
12 | 489 | 0.6% | |
13 | 438 | 0.5% | |
14 | 408 | 0.5% | |
15 | 369 | 0.4% | |
16 | 334 | 0.4% | |
17 | 302 | 0.4% | |
18 | 278 | 0.3% | |
19 | 250 | 0.3% | |
2 | 1584 | 1.9% | |
20 | 231 | 0.3% | |
21 | 212 | 0.3% | |
22 | 191 | 0.2% | |
23 | 176 | 0.2% | |
24 | 166 | 0.2% | |
25 | 153 | 0.2% | |
26 | 140 | 0.2% | |
27 | 125 | 0.2% | |
28 | 115 | 0.1% | |
29 | 103 | 0.1% | |
3 | 1389 | 1.7% | |
30 | 92 | 0.1% | |
31 | 83 | 0.1% | |
32 | 78 | 0.1% | |
33 | 69 | 0.1% | |
34 | 63 | 0.1% | |
35 | 58 | 0.1% | |
36 | 55 | 0.1% | |
37 | 50 | 0.1% | |
38 | 47 | 0.1% | |
39 | 43 | 0.1% | |
4 | 1196 | 1.5% | |
40 | 42 | 0.1% | |
41 | 40 | 0.0% | |
42 | 34 | 0.0% | |
43 | 34 | 0.0% | |
44 | 30 | 0.0% | |
45 | 27 | 0.0% | |
46 | 24 | 0.0% | |
47 | 23 | 0.0% | |
48 | 21 | 0.0% | |
49 | 19 | 0.0% | |
5 | 1071 | 1.3% | |
50 | 19 | 0.0% | |
51 | 16 | 0.0% | |
52 | 14 | 0.0% | |
53 | 14 | 0.0% | |
54 | 13 | 0.0% | |
55 | 10 | 0.0% | |
56 | 11 | 0.0% | |
57 | 9 | 0.0% | |
58 | 9 | 0.0% | |
59 | 9 | 0.0% | |
6 | 941 | 1.1% | |
60 | 9 | 0.0% | |
61 | 9 | 0.0% | |
62 | 9 | 0.0% | |
63 | 8 | 0.0% | |
64 | 7 | 0.0% | |
65 | 7 | 0.0% | |
66 | 6 | 0.0% | |
67 | 6 | 0.0% | |
68 | 5 | 0.0% | |
69 | 4 | 0.0% | |
7 | 842 | 1.0% | |
70 | 4 | 0.0% | |
71 | 4 | 0.0% | |
72 | 3 | 0.0% | |
73 | 3 | 0.0% | |
74 | 3 | 0.0% | |
75 | 3 | 0.0% | |
76 | 1 | 0.0% | |
8 | 751 | 0.9% | |
9 | 678 | 0.8% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.