India - Third Economic Census 1990
Reference ID | IDDI-IND-MOSPI-3-EC-1990 |
Year | 0 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | Central Statistical Organisation(CSO) - Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India (GOI) |
Collection(s) |
Created on
Apr 24, 2018
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
559868
- 02 Andhra Pradesh
- 03 Arunachal Pradesh
- 04 Assam
- 05 Bihar
- 06 Goa
- 07 Gujarat
- 08 Haryana
- 09 Himachal Pradesh
- 11 Karnataka
- 12 Kerala
- 13 Madhya Pradesh
- 14 Maharashtra
- 15 Manipur
- 16 Meghalaya
- 17 Mizoram
- 18 Nagaland
- 19 Orissa
- 20 Punjab
- 21 Rajasthan
- 22 Sikkim
- 23 Tamil Nadu
- 24 Tripura
- 25 Utter Pradesh
- 26 West Bengal
- 27 Andaman & Nic
obar - 28 Chandigarh
- 29 Dadar & Nagar
Haveli - 30 Daman & Diu
- 31 Delhi
- 33 Pondicherry
Males (hired)
(M_HIRED)
File: 18 Nagaland
File: 18 Nagaland
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 5 | Valid cases: 23771 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 11072 | 46.6% | |
1 | 5012 | 21.1% | |
10 | 168 | 0.7% | |
100 | 1 | 0.0% | |
104 | 1 | 0.0% | |
106 | 1 | 0.0% | |
1067 | 1 | 0.0% | |
11 | 78 | 0.3% | |
112 | 1 | 0.0% | |
113 | 1 | 0.0% | |
115 | 1 | 0.0% | |
116 | 1 | 0.0% | |
118 | 1 | 0.0% | |
12 | 115 | 0.5% | |
120 | 1 | 0.0% | |
125 | 2 | 0.0% | |
126 | 1 | 0.0% | |
129 | 1 | 0.0% | |
13 | 60 | 0.3% | |
132 | 2 | 0.0% | |
133 | 1 | 0.0% | |
134 | 1 | 0.0% | |
137 | 1 | 0.0% | |
14 | 67 | 0.3% | |
149 | 2 | 0.0% | |
15 | 71 | 0.3% | |
150 | 2 | 0.0% | |
152 | 1 | 0.0% | |
153 | 1 | 0.0% | |
157 | 1 | 0.0% | |
16 | 53 | 0.2% | |
164 | 1 | 0.0% | |
165 | 1 | 0.0% | |
17 | 32 | 0.1% | |
18 | 55 | 0.2% | |
181 | 1 | 0.0% | |
19 | 22 | 0.1% | |
195 | 1 | 0.0% | |
199 | 1 | 0.0% | |
2 | 2681 | 11.3% | |
20 | 56 | 0.2% | |
200 | 2 | 0.0% | |
209 | 1 | 0.0% | |
21 | 11 | 0.0% | |
211 | 2 | 0.0% | |
214 | 1 | 0.0% | |
215 | 1 | 0.0% | |
22 | 22 | 0.1% | |
23 | 14 | 0.1% | |
24 | 19 | 0.1% | |
25 | 30 | 0.1% | |
26 | 14 | 0.1% | |
27 | 12 | 0.1% | |
272 | 1 | 0.0% | |
28 | 9 | 0.0% | |
29 | 10 | 0.0% | |
3 | 1458 | 6.1% | |
30 | 22 | 0.1% | |
300 | 1 | 0.0% | |
31 | 6 | 0.0% | |
315 | 1 | 0.0% | |
32 | 4 | 0.0% | |
33 | 8 | 0.0% | |
34 | 8 | 0.0% | |
35 | 9 | 0.0% | |
36 | 6 | 0.0% | |
37 | 7 | 0.0% | |
38 | 5 | 0.0% | |
39 | 4 | 0.0% | |
4 | 913 | 3.8% | |
40 | 10 | 0.0% | |
400 | 1 | 0.0% | |
41 | 3 | 0.0% | |
42 | 7 | 0.0% | |
43 | 4 | 0.0% | |
438 | 1 | 0.0% | |
44 | 1 | 0.0% | |
45 | 4 | 0.0% | |
46 | 3 | 0.0% | |
47 | 4 | 0.0% | |
48 | 4 | 0.0% | |
49 | 1 | 0.0% | |
490 | 1 | 0.0% | |
5 | 598 | 2.5% | |
50 | 12 | 0.1% | |
500 | 1 | 0.0% | |
51 | 3 | 0.0% | |
52 | 3 | 0.0% | |
53 | 2 | 0.0% | |
54 | 1 | 0.0% | |
56 | 4 | 0.0% | |
57 | 2 | 0.0% | |
58 | 1 | 0.0% | |
59 | 2 | 0.0% | |
6 | 332 | 1.4% | |
60 | 4 | 0.0% | |
63 | 2 | 0.0% | |
64 | 2 | 0.0% | |
66 | 1 | 0.0% | |
68 | 2 | 0.0% | |
7 | 219 | 0.9% | |
70 | 2 | 0.0% | |
71 | 4 | 0.0% | |
72 | 1 | 0.0% | |
73 | 2 | 0.0% | |
74 | 1 | 0.0% | |
75 | 2 | 0.0% | |
76 | 1 | 0.0% | |
78 | 2 | 0.0% | |
79 | 1 | 0.0% | |
8 | 210 | 0.9% | |
80 | 2 | 0.0% | |
87 | 1 | 0.0% | |
88 | 1 | 0.0% | |
89 | 1 | 0.0% | |
9 | 125 | 0.5% | |
90 | 2 | 0.0% | |
93 | 2 | 0.0% | |
96 | 1 | 0.0% | |
97 | 1 | 0.0% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.