India - Urban Slums Survey, July 2012 - December 2012, NSS 69th Round
Reference ID | DDI-IND-MOSPI-NSSO-69Rnd-Sch-0dot21-2012 |
Year | 2012 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office - M/o Statistcs and Programme Implementation(MOSPI),Government of India (GOI) |
Sponsor(s) | M/o Statistics & Programme Implementation, GOI - MOSPI - |
Collection(s) | |
Metadata | Documentation in PDF |
Created on
Jan 18, 2018
Last modified
Mar 27, 2019
Page views
169482
- Block-1-Identificati
on of sample UFS blo
ck - Block-2-some salient
features of the slu
m(s) lying wholly or
partly within the s
ample UFS block - Block-3 - Characteri
stics of slum(s) lyi
ng wholly or partly
within the sample - Block-4-Change durin
g the last 5 years i
n the condition of t
he slum(s) lying who
lly or partly within
the sample UFS bloc
k. - Block-5-Particulars
of field operations
State
(State_code)
File: Block-5-Particulars of field operations
File: Block-5-Particulars of field operations
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 818 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
01 | JAMMU & KASHMIR | 11 | 1.3% |
02 | HIMACHAL PRADESH | 1 | 0.1% |
03 | PUNJAB | 17 | 2.1% |
04 | CHANDIGARH | 4 | 0.5% |
05 | UTTARANCHAL | 5 | 0.6% |
06 | HARYANA | 7 | 0.9% |
07 | DELHI | 11 | 1.3% |
08 | RAJASTHAN | 37 | 4.5% |
09 | UTTAR PRADESH | 41 | 5.0% |
10 | BIHAR | 19 | 2.3% |
11 | SIKKIM | 0 | 0.0% |
12 | ARUNACHAL PRADESH | 3 | 0.4% |
13 | NAGALAND | 0 | 0.0% |
14 | MANIPUR | 0 | 0.0% |
15 | MIZORAM | 4 | 0.5% |
16 | TRIPURA | 2 | 0.2% |
17 | MEGHALAYA | 2 | 0.2% |
18 | ASSAM | 8 | 1.0% |
19 | WEST BENGAL | 78 | 9.5% |
20 | JHARKHAND | 18 | 2.2% |
21 | ODISHA | 27 | 3.3% |
22 | CHHATTISGARH | 25 | 3.1% |
23 | MADHYA PRADESH | 64 | 7.8% |
24 | GUJARAT | 48 | 5.9% |
25 | DAMAN & DIU | 3 | 0.4% |
26 | D & N HAVELI | 2 | 0.2% |
27 | MAHARASHTRA | 149 | 18.2% |
28 | ANDHRA PRADESH | 100 | 12.2% |
29 | KARNATAKA | 60 | 7.3% |
30 | GOA | 6 | 0.7% |
31 | LAKSHADWEEP | 0 | 0.0% |
32 | KERALA | 5 | 0.6% |
33 | TAMIL NADU | 59 | 7.2% |
34 | PUDUCHERRY | 2 | 0.2% |
35 | A & N ISLANDS | 0 | 0.0% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.