Digg
Google Buzz
LinkedIn
Stumbleupon
Delicious
India - Employment and Unemployment, July 2009 - June 2010, 66th Round
| Reference ID | DDI-IND-MOSPI-NSSO-66-10-2011 |
| Year | 2009 - 2010 |
| Country | India |
| Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office - NSSO |
| Sponsor(s) | Govt. of India - - Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation - - |
| Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 18, 2018
Last modified
Mar 25, 2019
Page views
344212
- Block_1_2_Identifica
tion of sample house
hold and particulars
of field operation - Block_3_Household ch
aracteristics - Block_3_1_Indebtedne
ss of rural labour h
ousehold - Block_4_Demographic
particulars of house
hold members - Block_5_1_Usual prin
cipal activity parti
culars of household
members - Block_5_2_Usual subs
idiary economic acti
vity particulars of
household members - Block_5_3_Time dispo
sition during the we
ek ended on ........
...... - Block_6_Follow-up qu
estions for persons
unemployed on all th
e 7 days of the week - Block_7_1_Follow-up
questions on availab
ility for work to pe
rsons working in the
usual principal or
subsidiary status - Block_7_2_Follow-up
questions on change
of nature of work an
d_ or establishment
to persons working i
n the usual principa
l status or subsidia
ry status - Block_8_Follow-up qu
estions for persons
with usual principal
activity status cod
e 92 or 93 in col_3
of block_5_1 - Block_9_Household co
nsumer expenditure
(State_Region)
File: Block_3_1_Indebtedness of rural labour household
File: Block_3_1_Indebtedness of rural labour household
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 3 | Valid cases: 12003 Invalid: 0 |
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | 52 |  0.4%
| |
| 012 | 38 | 0.3%
| |
| 013 | 82 | 0.7%
| |
| 021 | 89 | 0.7%
| |
| 022 | 74 | 0.6%
| |
| 031 | 214 | 1.8%
| |
| 032 | 361 | 3.0%
| |
| 041 | 5 | 0.0%
| |
| 051 | 194 | 1.6%
| |
| 061 | 171 | 1.4%
| |
| 062 | 108 | 0.9%
| |
| 071 | 10 | 0.1%
| |
| 081 | 21 | 0.2%
| |
| 082 | 207 | 1.7%
| |
| 083 | 98 | 0.8%
| |
| 084 | 110 | 0.9%
| |
| 085 | 39 | 0.3%
| |
| 091 | 99 | 0.8%
| |
| 092 | 72 | 0.6%
| |
| 093 | 297 | 2.5%
| |
| 094 | 156 | 1.3%
| |
| 095 | 111 | 0.9%
| |
| 101 | 170 | 1.4%
| |
| 102 | 139 | 1.2%
| |
| 111 | 157 | 1.3%
| |
| 121 | 6 | 0.0%
| |
| 131 | 15 | 0.1%
| |
| 141 | 28 | 0.2%
| |
| 142 | 8 | 0.1%
| |
| 151 | 24 | 0.2%
| |
| 161 | 160 | 1.3%
| |
| 171 | 14 | 0.1%
| |
| 181 | 90 | 0.7%
| |
| 182 | 150 | 1.2%
| |
| 183 | 48 | 0.4%
| |
| 184 | 198 | 1.6%
| |
| 191 | 20 | 0.2%
| |
| 192 | 315 | 2.6%
| |
| 193 | 156 | 1.3%
| |
| 194 | 282 | 2.3%
| |
| 195 | 355 | 3.0%
| |
| 201 | 62 | 0.5%
| |
| 202 | 61 | 0.5%
| |
| 211 | 168 | 1.4%
| |
| 212 | 129 | 1.1%
| |
| 213 | 167 | 1.4%
| |
| 222 | 87 | 0.7%
| |
| 223 | 29 | 0.2%
| |
| 231 | 30 | 0.2%
| |
| 232 | 52 | 0.4%
| |
| 233 | 26 | 0.2%
| |
| 234 | 80 | 0.7%
| |
| 235 | 37 | 0.3%
| |
| 236 | 63 | 0.5%
| |
| 241 | 123 | 1.0%
| |
| 242 | 85 | 0.7%
| |
| 243 | 22 | 0.2%
| |
| 244 | 24 | 0.2%
| |
| 245 | 98 | 0.8%
| |
| 251 | 11 | 0.1%
| |
| 261 | 10 | 0.1%
| |
| 271 | 93 | 0.8%
| |
| 272 | 309 | 2.6%
| |
| 273 | 30 | 0.2%
| |
| 274 | 41 | 0.3%
| |
| 275 | 78 | 0.6%
| |
| 276 | 115 | 1.0%
| |
| 281 | 404 | 3.4%
| |
| 282 | 402 | 3.3%
| |
| 283 | 229 | 1.9%
| |
| 284 | 234 | 1.9%
| |
| 285 | 334 | 2.8%
| |
| 291 | 88 | 0.7%
| |
| 292 | 70 | 0.6%
| |
| 293 | 179 | 1.5%
| |
| 294 | 193 | 1.6%
| |
| 301 | 6 | 0.0%
| |
| 311 | 14 | 0.1%
| |
| 321 | 414 | 3.4%
| |
| 322 | 992 | 8.3%
| |
| 331 | 352 | 2.9%
| |
| 332 | 331 | 2.8%
| |
| 333 | 332 | 2.8%
| |
| 334 | 260 | 2.2%
| |
| 341 | 110 | 0.9%
| |
| 351 | 86 | 0.7%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.