Digg
Google Buzz
LinkedIn
Stumbleupon
Delicious
India - Fourth Economic Census 1998
| Reference ID | IDDI-IND-MOSPI-4-EC-1998 |
| Year | 0 |
| Country | India |
| Producer(s) | Central Statistical Organisation(CSO) - Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India (GOI) |
| Sponsor(s) | Government of India - GoI - |
| Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 16, 2018
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
682133
- 02 Andhra Pradesh
- 03 Arunachal Pradesh
- 04 Assam
- 05 Bihar
- 06 Goa
- 07 Gujarat
- 08 Haryana
- 09 HP
- 10 J&K
- 11 Karnataka
- 12 Kerala
- 13 Madhya Pradesh
- 14 Maharashtra
- 15 Manipur
- 16 Meghalaya
- 17 Mizoram
- 18 Nagaland
- 19 Orissa
- 20 Punjab
- 21 Rajsthan
- 22 Sikkim
- 23 TamilNadu
- 24 Tripura
- 25 UP
- 26 WB
- 27 AN&Island
- 28 Chandigarh
- 29 Dadar & Nagar
Haveli - 30 Daman & Diu
- 31 Delhi
- 32 Lashadweep
- 33 Pondichery
- 34 Jharkhand
- 35 Chhattisgarh
- 36 Uttaranchal
UFS BLOCK
(UFS_BLOCK)
File: 28 Chandigarh
File: 28 Chandigarh
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 39836 Invalid: 0 |
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00 | 2785 |  7.0%
| |
| 01 | 9214 | 23.1%
| |
| 02 | 1990 | 5.0%
| |
| 03 | 1584 | 4.0%
| |
| 04 | 1273 | 3.2%
| |
| 05 | 2808 | 7.0%
| |
| 06 | 1211 | 3.0%
| |
| 07 | 1894 | 4.8%
| |
| 08 | 2028 | 5.1%
| |
| 09 | 2396 | 6.0%
| |
| 10 | 959 | 2.4%
| |
| 11 | 1050 | 2.6%
| |
| 12 | 500 | 1.3%
| |
| 13 | 1063 | 2.7%
| |
| 14 | 1728 | 4.3%
| |
| 15 | 748 | 1.9%
| |
| 16 | 775 | 1.9%
| |
| 17 | 426 | 1.1%
| |
| 18 | 951 | 2.4%
| |
| 19 | 231 | 0.6%
| |
| 20 | 786 | 2.0%
| |
| 21 | 280 | 0.7%
| |
| 22 | 428 | 1.1%
| |
| 23 | 249 | 0.6%
| |
| 24 | 272 | 0.7%
| |
| 25 | 326 | 0.8%
| |
| 26 | 473 | 1.2%
| |
| 27 | 364 | 0.9%
| |
| 28 | 86 | 0.2%
| |
| 29 | 29 | 0.1%
| |
| 30 | 32 | 0.1%
| |
| 31 | 100 | 0.3%
| |
| 32 | 248 | 0.6%
| |
| 33 | 241 | 0.6%
| |
| 34 | 192 | 0.5%
| |
| 35 | 15 | 0.0%
| |
| 36 | 89 | 0.2%
| |
| 37 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 38 | 9 | 0.0%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.