India - Fourth Economic Census 1998
Reference ID | IDDI-IND-MOSPI-4-EC-1998 |
Year | 0 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | Central Statistical Organisation(CSO) - Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India (GOI) |
Sponsor(s) | Government of India - GoI - |
Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 16, 2018
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
681750
- 02 Andhra Pradesh
- 03 Arunachal Pradesh
- 04 Assam
- 05 Bihar
- 06 Goa
- 07 Gujarat
- 08 Haryana
- 09 HP
- 10 J&K
- 11 Karnataka
- 12 Kerala
- 13 Madhya Pradesh
- 14 Maharashtra
- 15 Manipur
- 16 Meghalaya
- 17 Mizoram
- 18 Nagaland
- 19 Orissa
- 20 Punjab
- 21 Rajsthan
- 22 Sikkim
- 23 TamilNadu
- 24 Tripura
- 25 UP
- 26 WB
- 27 AN&Island
- 28 Chandigarh
- 29 Dadar & Nagar
Haveli - 30 Daman & Diu
- 31 Delhi
- 32 Lashadweep
- 33 Pondichery
- 34 Jharkhand
- 35 Chhattisgarh
- 36 Uttaranchal
DISTRICT CODE
(DT)
File: 19 Orissa
File: 19 Orissa
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 1449665 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
01 | SAMBALPUR | 57202 | 3.9% |
02 | SUNDAR GARH | 53113 | 3.7% |
03 | KEONJHAR | 51795 | 3.6% |
04 | MAYURBHANJA | 123444 | 8.5% |
05 | BALASORE | 66738 | 4.6% |
06 | CUTTACK | 101158 | 7.0% |
07 | DHENKANAL | 35675 | 2.5% |
08 | PHULABANI | 26385 | 1.8% |
09 | BOLANGIR | 84140 | 5.8% |
10 | KALAHANDI | 42482 | 2.9% |
11 | KORAPUT | 30608 | 2.1% |
12 | GANJAM | 132988 | 9.2% |
13 | PURI | 52804 | 3.6% |
14 | NAYAGARH | 36332 | 2.5% |
15 | KHURDA | 80576 | 5.6% |
16 | GAJAPATI | 18599 | 1.3% |
17 | BHADRAK | 37441 | 2.6% |
18 | JAJPUR | 52078 | 3.6% |
19 | KENDRAPARA | 37065 | 2.6% |
20 | JAGATSINAGPUR | 50638 | 3.5% |
21 | BARAGARH | 57765 | 4.0% |
22 | ANUGUL | 47340 | 3.3% |
23 | SONEPUR | 29889 | 2.1% |
24 | NUAPADA | 17452 | 1.2% |
25 | NAWARANGPUR | 27457 | 1.9% |
26 | MALKANGIRI | 7538 | 0.5% |
27 | RAYAGADA | 28745 | 2.0% |
28 | JHARASUGUDA | 30657 | 2.1% |
29 | DEOGARH | 18530 | 1.3% |
30 | BOUDH | 13031 | 0.9% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.