India - Fourth Economic Census 1998
Reference ID | IDDI-IND-MOSPI-4-EC-1998 |
Year | 0 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | Central Statistical Organisation(CSO) - Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India (GOI) |
Sponsor(s) | Government of India - GoI - |
Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 16, 2018
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
681864
- 02 Andhra Pradesh
- 03 Arunachal Pradesh
- 04 Assam
- 05 Bihar
- 06 Goa
- 07 Gujarat
- 08 Haryana
- 09 HP
- 10 J&K
- 11 Karnataka
- 12 Kerala
- 13 Madhya Pradesh
- 14 Maharashtra
- 15 Manipur
- 16 Meghalaya
- 17 Mizoram
- 18 Nagaland
- 19 Orissa
- 20 Punjab
- 21 Rajsthan
- 22 Sikkim
- 23 TamilNadu
- 24 Tripura
- 25 UP
- 26 WB
- 27 AN&Island
- 28 Chandigarh
- 29 Dadar & Nagar
Haveli - 30 Daman & Diu
- 31 Delhi
- 32 Lashadweep
- 33 Pondichery
- 34 Jharkhand
- 35 Chhattisgarh
- 36 Uttaranchal
IV UNIT
(IV_UNIT)
File: 12 Kerala
File: 12 Kerala
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 3 | Valid cases: 1564671 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
000 | 1238854 | 79.2% | |
001 | 85803 | 5.5% | |
002 | 71594 | 4.6% | |
003 | 25907 | 1.7% | |
004 | 16455 | 1.1% | |
005 | 9457 | 0.6% | |
006 | 5755 | 0.4% | |
007 | 6797 | 0.4% | |
008 | 5041 | 0.3% | |
009 | 4544 | 0.3% | |
010 | 4528 | 0.3% | |
011 | 3115 | 0.2% | |
012 | 4721 | 0.3% | |
013 | 4642 | 0.3% | |
014 | 3257 | 0.2% | |
015 | 3846 | 0.2% | |
016 | 3281 | 0.2% | |
017 | 3011 | 0.2% | |
018 | 3308 | 0.2% | |
019 | 2533 | 0.2% | |
020 | 4096 | 0.3% | |
021 | 3058 | 0.2% | |
022 | 2652 | 0.2% | |
023 | 1027 | 0.1% | |
024 | 5155 | 0.3% | |
025 | 2949 | 0.2% | |
026 | 1878 | 0.1% | |
027 | 2347 | 0.1% | |
028 | 2688 | 0.2% | |
029 | 1732 | 0.1% | |
030 | 4378 | 0.3% | |
031 | 9476 | 0.6% | |
032 | 1499 | 0.1% | |
033 | 2042 | 0.1% | |
034 | 3533 | 0.2% | |
035 | 5104 | 0.3% | |
036 | 1506 | 0.1% | |
037 | 1453 | 0.1% | |
100 | 184 | 0.0% | |
170 | 231 | 0.0% | |
200 | 835 | 0.1% | |
300 | 4 | 0.0% | |
800 | 395 | 0.0% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.