India - Annual Survey of Industries 1983-84
Reference ID | IND-CSO-ASI-1983-84-v1 |
Year | 1984 - 1985 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | Central Statistics Office (Industrial Statistics Wing) - MOSPI, Government of India |
Sponsor(s) | MOSPI, Government of India - GOI - |
Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 08, 2018
Last modified
Mar 26, 2019
Page views
129787
- IDENTIFICATION PARTI
CULARS (B1,2,6,7) - B4-FIXED ASSETS
- B5-WORKING CAPITAL
- B6-OUTSTANDING LOAN
- B8A-EMPLOYMENT AND E
MOLUMENTS - B8A86-EMPLOYMENT AND
EMOLUMENTS - B8B-EMPLOYEES BENEFI
TS - B8B88-EMPLOYMENT AND
EMOLUMENTS - B10-OTHER INPUT ITEM
S - B11-NON-IND SERVICES
COST - B11C-NON-IND SERVICE
S COST - B12-OTHER OUTPUT
- B13-MATERIALS CONSUM
ED - B13-INDUSTRIAL COMPO
NENTS - B14-PRODUCTS AND BY-
PRODUCTS-1 - B14A-DISTRIBUTIVE EX
PENSES
Variable Groups
State Code
(State)
File: B8B88-EMPLOYMENT AND EMOLUMENTS
File: B8B88-EMPLOYMENT AND EMOLUMENTS
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: numeric Width: 2 Decimals: 0 Range: 6-95 | Valid cases: 45457 Invalid: 0 Minimum: 11 Maximum: 54 |
Questions and instructions
State Code
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
11 | RAJASTHAN | 1233 | 2.7% |
12 | PUNJAB | 2740 | 6.0% |
13 | JAMMU & KASHMIR | 235 | 0.5% |
14 | HARYANA | 1499 | 3.3% |
15 | HIMACHAL PRADESH | 161 | 0.4% |
16 | DELHI | 1641 | 3.6% |
17 | CHANDIGARH | 224 | 0.5% |
21 | UTTAR PRADESH | 3683 | 8.1% |
22 | MADHYA PRADESH | 1455 | 3.2% |
31 | BIHAR | 1344 | 3.0% |
32 | ORISSA | 577 | 1.3% |
33 | WEST BENGAL | 3053 | 6.7% |
34 | ASSAM | 844 | 1.9% |
35 | MANIPUR | 28 | 0.1% |
36 | TRIPURA | 172 | 0.4% |
37 | NAGALAND | 0 | 0.0% |
38 | MEGHALAYA | 23 | 0.1% |
39 | ARUNCHAL PRADESH | 0 | 0.0% |
41 | ANDHRA PRADESH | 3339 | 7.3% |
42 | TAMIL NADU | 5527 | 12.2% |
43 | KERALA | 1547 | 3.4% |
44 | PONDICHERRY | 121 | 0.3% |
45 | ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR ISLANDS | 28 | 0.1% |
51 | GUJARAT | 5627 | 12.4% |
52 | MAHARASHTRA | 7728 | 17.0% |
53 | KARNATAKA | 2455 | 5.4% |
54 | DAMAN & DIU | 173 | 0.4% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.