India - Employment and Unemployment Survey, January 2004 - June 2004, NSS 60th Round
Reference ID | DDI-IND-MOSPI-NSSO-60th-Sch10-2004 |
Year | 2004 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office - M/o Statistcs and Programme Implementation(MOSPI),Government of India (GOI) |
Sponsor(s) | M/o Statistics & Programme Implementation, GOI - MOSPI - |
Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 18, 2018
Last modified
Mar 27, 2019
Page views
146591
- Block-1-sample-house
hold-identification-
records - Block-3-Household-ch
aracteristics-record
s - Block-4-Demographic-
usual- activity-memb
ers-records - Block-5-Members-time
-disposition-records - Block-6-unemployed-p
ersons-records - Block-7-members-voca
tional-training-reco
rds - Block-8-Household-co
nsumer-expenditure-r
ecords
Usual principal activity-Status
(B7_c4)
File: Block-7-members-vocational-training-records
File: Block-7-members-vocational-training-records
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 60217 Invalid: 0 |
Questions and instructions
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
11 | worked in hh. enterprise (self-employed) as own account worker | 5301 | 8.8% |
12 | worked in hh. enterprise (self-employed) as employer | 71 | 0.1% |
21 | worked as helper in hh. enterprises (unpaid family worker) | 7709 | 12.8% |
31 | worked as regular salaried/wage employee | 4936 | 8.2% |
41 | worked as casual wage labour : in public works | 55 | 0.1% |
51 | worked as casual wage labour : in other types of work | 4185 | 6.9% |
81 | did not work but was seeking and/or available for work | 3270 | 5.4% |
91 | attended educational institutions | 22877 | 38.0% |
92 | attended domestic duties only | 8858 | 14.7% |
93 | attended domestic duties and was also engaged in free collection of goods for hh. use | 2587 | 4.3% |
94 | rentiers, pensioners, remittance recipients, etc. | 40 | 0.1% |
95 | not able to work due to disability | 86 | 0.1% |
96 | beggars, prostitutes | 3 | 0.0% |
97 | Others | 239 | 0.4% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
As given in C1